Community initiative to halt expansion of the local Catalyst industrial waste dump.

Flyash uses

(From a contact email):

I am a little confused, as to the need for the extension of this land-fill. I certainly understand the opposition, in terms of the development of a hazardous, omnipresent eye-sore in Wildwood. What I am confused about, however, is why there needs to be all of this dumping in the first place! The report mentions that a great deal of the waste in question is 'flyash.'

I grew up in Powell River, but I lived in Saskatchewan for six years, while attending the University of Regina. A good friend of mine's father worked for SaskPower, a provincial crown corporation that actively sells their flyash. In fact, my friend's dad's entire job, was to go around the province selling flyash to contractors! http://www.saskpowerinternational.com/spi/bussol/flyash/flyash.shtml

So why can't Catalyst do the same? It would certainly remove the need to dump this potential commodity in our back yards.

Update on Flyash uses

At an informal meeting with two Catalyst spokespersons last evening at the Wildwood Ratepayers group, we were told that four years ago the mill did extensive research into possible uses of their flyash, but dead-ended when the possible usages they examined were eliminated, do to various problems with the end-users.

The following is an examination of that claim.

Here is a sample analysis to determine Catalyst's flyash corrosive potential, and to designate its Packing Group classification. (PDF file)

And the following is the last known email from prospective buyers of flyash to Catalyst. As far as we know, this email was never followed up by Catalyst:

"I have been able to produce solids - though the high water demand from this ash is somewhat more challenging than using gray C ash.  For example, in most ash-based mixes, I can get a free flowing wet slurry by adding 35 to 40 grams of water to 100 grams of dry ash.  In the case of this BC ash, I need 57.5 g of water on 100 grams of ash to get the same viscosity.  RESULT:  We can make light weight mineral foam (like AAC blocks) but we need more time to cure them or dry them out than we need for regular Class C ash. This extra water precludes us from making high strength composites like the 60 MpA mix that I made from ABC's ash."

"As I told you, [Catalyst] we can still produce a useful product from your ash but not the range of products that we contemplated when we all met in your conference room. The two significant differences with your ash are lower compressive strength and longer time to cure. Simply put, the economics are not the same when all we produce is AAC blocks, etc., especially when they take longer to produce. That said, there could still be a business opportunity if Catalyst is interested in further discussions."

Why didn't Catalyst follow up on this? Why did they stop all investigation of alternatives to landfilling four years ago?

The community of Wildwood, and the community of the greater Powell River area are deeply concerned about whether Catalyst is REALLY trying to find markets for their flyash. While it is of merely possible interest to the mill managers and their corporate financiers, it is vitally important to the neighbours of the landfill, do to the terrible consequences of such a hazardous waste dump in such close proximity to an agricultural neighbourhood. It is also extremely annoying that we the neighbors must do the work of this investigation and research in order to protect our lives, health, legacy and property values. This research is properly the responsibility of the Catalyst corporation, to follow up on any and all possibilities regarding alternatives to dumping their waste in our neighbourhood.

reply

Their flyash is different than the coal-burning product you referenced because of the materials that go into their boilers, such as "hogfuel", which is saltwater soaked biomass.

It feels really great to have support and interest from the "outside" world. As you know, Powell River is pretty isolated and it can feel overwhelming when a big company like Catalyst decides they're going to do something whether you like it or not. We need to have "outside eyes" on this process to make sure that government doesn't just rubber stamp this approval

Quote from Dave Harris' letter

I have consistently mentioned that the solution to the whole question of the fly ash is to treat it as a product. It is in thinking of it as such, that the solution lies. In the past, when the fly ash was sent to Rebanco, the ash had to meet technical specifications for it to travel to and be accepted by Rebanco. The fly ash was put into containers, sealed and secured and then shipped according to specifications. This worked for years, and only ceased to be attractive because of rising costs. Even if in the short term, Catalyst Paper- Powell River Division must now use Rebanco again, it can now utilize the whole concept of mixing water with the fly ash to form a solid. In forming a solid “product” for shipment, handling and transportation costs are significantly lower than using empty canisters that must be handled both when empty and full, and have a unit cost of their own.

Also, once the fly ash is solid, it is acceptable to other, more localized, facilities than just Rebanco. If the fly ash was cast into moulds that formed units of a size and shape which could be handled by the existing mechanical loaders now used to handle paper rolls, great efficiencies could be achieved in loading and offloading rail cars or barges.

While reading the Golder Associates technical report, despite its inadequacies, the discussion regarding the Crofton leachate, introduced the commonality of the fly ash from all the hog fuelled boilers along the coast. If in solving the riddle of what to do with the fly ash generated in Powell River; Catalyst Paper-Powell River Division could then also offer its solution to the other Catalyst Paper mills on this coast. Not only would Catalyst Paper gain a competitive advantage among other paper companies, it would give Powell River Division an advantage within Catalyst Paper itself. All the other mills along this coast are facing, or soon will face, the question of their own waste disposal. The first one to find a solution that can be offered to others within the industry would benefit immensely. Catalyst Paper – Powell River Division is in a strategic position now as it solves this conundrum.

A rational solution would be for Catalyst Paper- Powell River Division to recognize the reality that the landfill in Wildwood does not contain the answers to the waste question. Catalyst Paper- Powell River Division should elect to decommission the landfill as an attempt to solve its deficiencies and to limit the liabilities of the site. A new and separate business entity would probably need to be created to handle the storage of the fly ash solids, and other contracted items to be received. A rational search for an appropriate site, large enough for the entire industry to utilize need not take long. –after all, how many abandoned open pit mine sites are there? Nor should they be overly expensive. Even sites, as close as on Texada Island, offer significant advantages over Powell River due to a much-reduced rainfall.

A further attractive feature of this proposal is that there is a built in incentive for the producers of the ash to find some sort of use for even small portions of the ash being handled. As part of the process, the sending facility that produces the ash would be in a position to easily implement reductions of volumes to be sent out for storage. The sending facility would be able to receive a benefit to itself by already beginning to process the fly ash. And the company in business to receive the solid wastes would be in a position to utilize the raw resource as it is being handled within the storage process itself.

Source

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.